Tribunal Hears Atiku’ Objection of Bulkachuwa on Wednesday

Tribunal Hears Atiku’s Objection to Bulkachuwa on Wednesday

May 16, 2019 5:28

Alex Enumah in Abuja

The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT) Wednesday, fixed Wednesday for hearing in an application by the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the February 23 presidential election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, seeking the withdrawal of tribunal Chairman, Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa, from the panel.

Atiku and his party, the PDP are seeking withdrawal of Justice Bulkachuwa from the panel that would hear their petition against the election of President Muhammadu Buhari on grounds of likelihood of bias against them.

At the resumed hearing, lead counsel to Atiku and PDP, Dr. Levi Uzoukwu SAN, applied for 10 minutes private audience with the five member panel and lead counsel in the matter for an undisclosed reason.

However, at the end of the meeting held in the judge’s chamber, Justice Bulkachuwa, announced in the open court that the meeting discussed extensively the application by Atiku and PDP that she recused herself from the matter.

Justice Bulkachuwa said since the request of the petitioners has been in the public domain, it would be better for the application to be heard in the open court. She then asked the petitioners’ lawyer to move the application.

Uzoukwu said the petitioners will come by way of a formal application, promising to file the application tomorrow (May 16).

While counsel to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Mr. Yunus Ustaz SAN, said they are not opposed to the application, counsel to Buhari, Chief Wole Olanipekun SAN, said he was ready to respond to the application if the petitioners are ready to move the application orally.

He, however, said if the petitioners prefer a formal application, then they will be asking for the normal seven days provided by law to respond.

Counsel to the All Progressives Congress (APC), Mr. Lateef Fagbemi SAN, said he aligned himself with the position of Olanipekun.

Consequently, Justice Bulkachuwa said: “Application yet to be filed is adjourned to May 22 for hearing.”

Meanwhile, the tribunal has ordered the service of the petition of the Coalition for Change (C4C) on Buhari through substituted service.

The court ordered that the petition on Buhari be served on him through any of the national officers of the APC at the party’s national headquarters at No 40 Blantyre Street, Wuse 2, Abuja.

The order was sequel to an application moved by lawyer of the C4C, Mr. Obed Aguh.

Earlier, the police had barricaded all roads leading to the Court of Appeal, Abuja, venue of the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal, forcing commuters around the Federal Secretariat and Force Headquarters to seek alternative routes.

At 9.20am when THISDAY got to the venue, stern looking policemen and officers of the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) had cordoned off the area, screening and interrogating anyone seeking to access the tribunal.

Journalists with ID cards were, however, given access to the premises including robed legal practitioners.

The blockade may not be unconnected with the call by the PDP on Justice Bulkachuwa to recuse herself from the petition on allegations of bias.

The party had in a letter to the Court of Appeal President dated May 9, 2019 and signed by the National Chairman of the PDP, Chief Uche Secondus, and the party’s National Secretary, Senator Umar Tsauri, said that going by the utterances of Justice Bulkachuwa at the inaugural session of the tribunal, the party was certain that justice would not be served at the end of the day, if Justice Bulkachuwa remains a member of the panel.

They said: “My Lord, in your address at the opening of the pre-hearing today (Wednesday), you made some remarks that are both frightening and heartwarming. For instance in your opening paragraph you said:

“Elections are held in Nigeria every four years into elective positions. No matter how well the election is conducted there are bound to be complaints….

“This remark rocked our confidence in a panel led by Your Lordship to determine our fate in an election which could be one of the ones that were very well “conducted’ in Your Lordship’s opinion.”

The party further submitted that Justice Bulkachuwa ought not to have been a member of the panel at all, knowing full well that members of her family, including her husband are all members of the All Progressives Congress (APC), a party in the petition.

The party said that their worry arose from the very unique and critical position of the office of the President of the Court of Appeal, which is saddled with the sacred responsibility of hearing petitions arising from the presidential election.

“This fear was palpable enough just with you as the President of the Court of Appeal but has now been worsened and compounded by the discovery that you have decided to appoint yourself as the chairman of the panel to hear the petition,” the PDP said.

It, however, reminded Justice Bulkachuwa to be guided by her own words when she said: “Justice demands that judges who will sit in the panel of a tribunal be divested from all forms of bias” and accordingly do the needful.

The PDP stated: “We are reasoning that, armed with this golden rule of justice and fair hearing and given your direct intimacy through your dear husband, with the APC, one of the parties in this election petition, Your Lordship, would have exercised your constitutional right and powers guardedly, judiciously and judicially, by excluding yourself from the panel of this honourable court sitting over this particular petition.

“This is the only way you could have divested yourself from all forms of bias and be seen to be fair, both to yourself, our party, that is contesting against your husband’s party in this petition, and indeed, all Nigerians, who are keenly interested in the just, transparently impartial and unbiased determination of this petition over an election which outcome obviously did not respect their wishes as expressed through their votes.”

At the inaugural sitting of the panel, scores of protesters had besieged the venue of the tribunal, with placards urging the tribunal to do justice in the matter.

At yesterday’s sitting also, notwithstanding the heavy presence of security operatives, large number of persons perceived to be in support of the PDP’s candidate were seen gathered near the complex of the office of the Head of Service, by the Federal Secretariat, Abuja